Dependent columns implies non-invertible
Dependent columns implies non-invertible
If a square matrix has column vectors which form a dependent set, then the square matrix is not invertible.
Proof: Let be numbers giving the dependency relation. These numbers can be combined into a vector . Then:
However, since the are not all zero, we know , and therefore sends something nonzero to zero, which means it cannot be invertible. (Otherwise, what would be the preimage of zero?)
Independence
Independence
Problem: Is the following set of vectors dependent or independent?
Solution: It must be a dependent set. These vectors live in , which is spanned by . If these vectors were independent, then we could use Steinitz Exchange to write as the span of just three of them. Since the fourth is also in , it could then be written as a combination of the other three, contradicting independence.
3 vectors spanning 3D space must be independent
3 vectors spanning 3D space must be independent
In Problem 05-02, we saw that the span
is a 3-dimensional subspace of . (In fact it is , since the Steinitz Exchange will put all three in the same span as this.) Therefore we know the vectors are independent, because there are three vectors spanning a 3D space.